Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

DOGE0.070.84%SOL19.370.72%USDC1.000.01%BNB287.900.44%AVAX15.990.06%XLM0.080.37%
USDT1.000%XRP0.392.6%BCH121.000.75%DOT5.710.16%ADA0.320.37%LTC85.290.38%
THE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & LifestyleTHE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & Lifestyle

Technology

Technology

UK wants court to limit COVID inquiry’s WhatsApp access.

A woman uses her phone next to a logo of the WhatsApp application during Global Fintech Fest in Mumb... A woman uses her phone next to a logo of the WhatsApp application during Global Fintech Fest in Mumbai, India September 20, 2022. REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas
A woman uses her phone next to a logo of the WhatsApp application during Global Fintech Fest in Mumb... A woman uses her phone next to a logo of the WhatsApp application during Global Fintech Fest in Mumbai, India September 20, 2022. REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas

Listen to the article now

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s government urged London’s High Court on Friday to block a public inquiry into its COVID-19 pandemic response and hand over some private WhatsApp messages.

This month, Britain’s Cabinet Office refused to share WhatsApp communications about the pandemic and other political topics, calling some content “unambiguously irrelevant.”

The inquiry, overseen by retired senior judge Heather Hallett, was commissioned by the government in 2021 and requested two years’ worth of WhatsApp chats between key officials, including former prime minister Boris Johnson and 40 individuals.

The Cabinet Office’s lawyer James Eadie told the court that the Cabinet Office challenged the inquiry’s demands “with some considerable reluctance.”

He stated in court filings that materials pertinent to the inquiry “simply cannot cover all government business and all the policy areas that were live over the two years.”

Eadie said the WhatsApp communications included personal and family information and “comments of a personal nature” concerning government individuals.

However, Hallett’s attorneys called the Cabinet Office’s constraints on public inquiries’ document compulsion “flawed and unworkable.”

In court filings, Hugo Keith said a witness statement submitted by Johnson earlier this month led to a reevaluation of WhatsApp chats.

“Material that had been redacted by the Cabinet Office as ‘unambiguously irrelevant’ is now assessed as relevant in light of Mr Johnson’s statement,” Keith added.

Johnson’s lawyers claim the Cabinet Office’s complaint should be rejected since Johnson is a party.

“Mr Johnson has no objection to the inquiry inspecting the materials unredacted, subject to appropriate security and confidentiality arrangements,” they wrote in court filings.


Comment Template

You May Also Like

Technology

Anthropic stated on Thursday that the advantages of California’s updated measure, which aims to control the development and deployment of artificial intelligence within the...

Business

By the year’s end, Taco Bell plans to have implemented AI ordering at hundreds of US sites, following two years of testing in a...

Business

The Oversight Board reported Thursday that Meta failed to remove an explicit, AI-generated image of an Indian public figure until it was questioned by...

Economy

Matthias Heck, Moody’s industry analyst, estimates that electric vehicles would have attained that market share after 2035 without these rules. He said the EPA’s...

Notice: The Biznob uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience and analyze our traffic. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Policy.

Ok