Russia said Wednesday it was worried about Japan’s release of treated radioactive water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant and asked Tokyo for details.
China was furious when Japan released treated radioactive water from the Fukushima plant into the Pacific Ocean last month, banning all seafood imports from Japan.
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova claimed Tokyo had been opaque. “We don’t see transparency or openness from Tokyo,” Zakharova told reporters.
Zakharova believed Japan would provide scientifically-based and thorough information to discharge-affected nations. “China and the Japanese have expressed similar concerns,” Zakharova added.
A 2011 earthquake and tsunami caused a nuclear meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi power station in Japan, the most serious nuclear accident since Chornobyl 25 years earlier.
Japan maintains the water leak is safe and that the IAEA found the effect on humans and the environment “negligible.”
The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011 was a catastrophic event that released radioactive materials into the environment. In the aftermath, Japan has been grappling with the daunting task of managing and disposing of the accumulated radioactive water used to cool the damaged reactors. As of September 13, 2023, Japan has decided to discharge this treated radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean.
Japan has invested heavily in advanced treatment processes to ensure the radioactive water is decontaminated to meet international safety standards before discharge. This treatment involves a multi-step process, including:
- Filtration: The water is passed through a series of filters to remove solid particles and debris.
- Ion Exchange: Ion exchange resins remove radioactive elements such as strontium and cesium from the water.
- Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS): ALPS is employed to remove additional radioactive substances and reduce radioactive levels to below regulatory limits.
- Dilution: The treated water is diluted with seawater to reduce the concentration of radioactive substances further.
Japan asserts that this extensive treatment ensures that the discharged water will not significantly threaten the environment or human health.
While Japan claims that the discharged water will meet safety standards, concerns persist regarding the potential impact on marine ecosystems. Critics argue that even low radiation levels can harm marine life and disrupt the delicate balance of ocean ecosystems. Additionally, there are concerns about the long-term effects on fisheries and the livelihoods of coastal communities.
Japan’s decision to discharge treated radioactive water has not been without international scrutiny and criticism. Neighboring countries like South Korea and China have expressed strong opposition, voicing concerns about the potential transboundary impact. The international community has called for transparency and ongoing monitoring to ensure the safety of the operation.
In conclusion, Japan’s decision to discharge treated radioactive water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is complex and contentious. While Japan insists that the treated water meets safety standards, environmental concerns persist, and international tensions are mounting. The global community continues to monitor this situation closely, emphasizing the need for transparency, rigorous monitoring, and accountability to protect our oceans and future generations’ health.
Comment Template