Simply put, fiat currency is legal tender that derives its value from the government that issues it, rather than from a physical good or commodity. In this type of money, the government’s ability to establish the value of fiat currency is critical. The fiat currency system is used by most countries around the world to buy goods and services, invest, and save. The gold standard and other commodity-based systems were replaced by fiat currency in determining the value of the legal tender.
Fiat Currency’s Ascension
China was the birthplace of fiat currency centuries ago. During the 11th century, the province of Szechuan began issuing paper money. It could be exchanged for silk, gold, or silver at first. However, in the 13th century, Kublai Khan rose to power and established a fiat currency system. Historians claim that this money played a role in the Mongol Empire’s demise, with excessive spending and hyperinflation at the root of the empire’s demise.
Fiat money was also used in Europe during the 17th century, with Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands being among the first to do so. In Sweden, the system was a failure, and the government eventually switched to the silver standard. New France in Canada, the American Colonies, and finally the United States Federal Government experimented with fiat money over the next two centuries, with mixed results.
By the twentieth century, the United States had returned to limited use of commodity-based currency. The practice of exchanging paper money for gold was abolished by the government in 1933. By 1972, under President Nixon, the United States had completely abandoned the gold standard, effectively putting an end to it on a global scale, and had switched to a fiat currency system. As a result, fiat currency became widely used around the world.
The Gold Standard vs. Fiat Currency
Paper bills could be converted to gold under the gold standard system. In fact, the government held a finite amount of gold that was used to back all paper money. Governments and banks could only introduce a new currency into the economy if they held an equal amount of gold in their vaults under a commodity-based currency system. The government’s ability to create money and increase the value of its currency solely based on economic factors was limited under this system.
Money, on the other hand, cannot be converted into anything else under the fiat currency system. Authorities can directly influence the value of their currency and link it to economic conditions using fiat money. Governments and central banks in their countries have far more control over currency systems. They can use a variety of tools to respond to different financial events and crises, such as the creation of fractional reserve banking and the implementation of quantitative easing.
A commodity-based currency system, according to proponents of the gold standard, is more stable because it is backed by something tangible and valuable. Supporters of fiat currencies argue that gold prices have been volatile. Both commodity-based currency and fiat money’s value or worth can fluctuate in this context. A fiat currency system, on the other hand, gives the government more leeway to act in the event of an economic emergency.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Fiat Money
Economists and other financial experts are divided on whether fiat currency is a good idea. The advantages and disadvantages of this currency system are passionately debated by supporters and opponents.
Scarcity: The scarcity of a physical commodity like gold has no effect on fiat money.
Producing fiat money is less expensive than producing commodity-based money.
Fiat currency provides governments and central banks with the flexibility to respond to economic crises.
Fiat currency is accepted as a form of currency for international trade because it is used in countries all over the world.
Convenience: Unlike gold, fiat money is not reliant on physical reserves, which necessitate costly storage, protection, and monitoring.
Fiat currency is worthless because it has no intrinsic value. This enables governments to create money out of thin air, potentially resulting in hyperinflation and the collapse of their economic system.
Fiat currency systems have typically resulted in financial collapses in the past, indicating that these systems are risky.
Cryptocurrency vs. Fiat Currency
The fact that neither fiat currency nor cryptocurrency is backed by a physical commodity is a point of convergence, but that’s where the similarities end. While governments and central banks control fiat money, cryptocurrencies are essentially decentralized, thanks to Blockchain, a distributed digital ledger.
Another significant distinction between these two currency systems is how each of these currencies is created. Bitcoin, like most other cryptocurrencies, has a finite supply. Banks, on the other hand, can create fiat money out of thin air based on their assessment of a country’s economic needs.
Because cryptocurrencies are a digital form of money with no physical counterpart and no borders, they are less restrictive for international transactions. Furthermore, unlike the fiat system, transactions are irreversible, and the nature of cryptocurrencies makes tracking much more difficult.
The cryptocurrency market is noteworthy in that it is much smaller and, as a result, much more volatile than traditional markets. This is most likely one of the reasons why cryptocurrencies have yet to gain widespread acceptance; however, as the crypto economy matures, volatility will likely decrease.
MORE:
Comment Template