Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

DOGE0.070.84%SOL19.370.72%BNB287.900.44%USDC1.000.01%AVAX15.990.06%XLM0.080.37%
USDT1.000%XRP0.392.6%BCH121.000.75%DOT5.710.16%ADA0.320.37%LTC85.290.38%
THE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & LifestyleTHE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & Lifestyle

Technology

Technology

EU seeks highest court support in $14 billion Apple tax dispute.

The logo of the European Court of Justice is pictured outside the main courtroom in Luxembourg Janua... The logo of the European Court of Justice is pictured outside the main courtroom in Luxembourg January 26, 2017. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir//File Photo
The logo of the European Court of Justice is pictured outside the main courtroom in Luxembourg Janua... The logo of the European Court of Justice is pictured outside the main courtroom in Luxembourg January 26, 2017. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir//File Photo

Listen to the article now

EU seeks highest court support in $14 billion Apple tax dispute. On Tuesday, EU competition officials asked the bloc’s highest Court to overturn a lower tribunal and force Apple (AAPL.O) to pay a record 13 billion euros ($14.3 billion) in Irish back taxes.

The lawsuit, which might affect company tax bills, is the most prominent of EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager’s battle against multinationals’ sweetheart deals with EU governments.
“Its outcome will determine whether member states may continue to grant multinational substantial tax breaks in return for jobs and investments,” Commission lawyer Paul-John Loewenthal told the CJEU.

In 2016, the European Commission found that two Irish tax judgments had unjustly lowered Apple’s tax burden to 0.005%.

The General Court ruled 2020 that regulators failed to prove Apple had an unfair advantage.

Loewenthal told Court of Justice judges the verdict was “legally flawed” and should be overturned.

Apple denied the Commission’s claims, saying it paid its fair share of taxes in the right countries.

“The profits we are talking about – the profits the Commission said should be attributed to these branches in Ireland – those profits were in fact subject to the U.S. tax regime,” Daniel Beard told the Court.

“Apple built up reserves for the payment of those U.S. taxes and is paying around 20 billion euros in U.S. tax on those very same profits that the Commission says should have been taxed by Ireland,” he said. Apple paid Irish tax obligations.

The EU competition enforcer has lost court cases to Fiat Chrysler, now Stellantis (STLAM.MI), Amazon (AMZN.O), and Starbucks (SBUX.O). Still, the CJEU sided with it in a Belgian tax break case against a group of multinationals in September. C-465/20 P Commission v Ireland and Others is the Tuesday case.

A final Court of Justice judgment is expected in the following months.


Comment Template

You May Also Like

Business

In the wake of Walmart’s departure as a major stakeholder and a stagnating Chinese e-commerce market, JD.com must persuade investors of its importance. This...

Technology

Anthropic stated on Thursday that the advantages of California’s updated measure, which aims to control the development and deployment of artificial intelligence within the...

Economy

Friday saw dollar weakness as investors braced for Jackson Hole address by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, while the yen topped other currencies in...

Politics

  Joe Biden had other plans for his address. Under the current conditions, at least not this year. Tragedies and hardships have left their...

Notice: The Biznob uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience and analyze our traffic. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Policy.

Ok