Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

slide 3 of 2

Hostile Takeover Bid: What it is, Tactics, Comeback

File Photo: Hostile Takeover Bid: What it is, Tactics, Comeback
File Photo: Hostile Takeover Bid: What it is, Tactics, Comeback File Photo: Hostile Takeover Bid: What it is, Tactics, Comeback

What Is a Hostile Takeover Bid?

A hostile takeover offer involves acquiring a controlling stake in a public business without the knowledge or agreement of its board of directors. If the board rejects a bidder’s offer, the buyer might tender, start a proxy war, or buy company stock.

Understanding the Hostile Takeover Bid

A firm usually launches a takeover offer to expand, eliminate a competitor, or both. The corporation may aim to increase its client base, distribution networks, market share, or technical edge.

An activist shareholder may bid to enhance the target company’s performance and profit from its stock price increase.

Making an offer to the company’s board of directors to buy a controlling interest is typical. The board of directors may reject an offer if it does not benefit the company’s shareholders.

At such a point, a hostile takeover may occur.

Combative Takeover Bids

The acquirer can buy enough business stock on the open market to gain control. Acquiring a large company share leads to a more fantastic price, making it difficult to achieve. The aggressor will undoubtedly overpay because the price increase has little to do with the company’s success.

Two main methods remain:

Tender Offer

The potential purchaser may propose a tender to the company’s shareholders—a tender offer to acquire a controlling stake in the target’s shares at a set price. The price is frequently higher than the market price to encourage share sales. This official offer may have an expiration date. After filing paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the acquirer must submit a statement of their plans for the target firm. Companies can defend against tender proposals via takeover defense techniques. Such instances may include proxy fights.

Proxy Fight

A proxy struggle aims to replace board members who oppose the takeover with those who support it. This entails convincing shareholders to alter management. If shareholders want a management change, they allow the potential acquirer to vote their shares by proxy for a new board member or member. If the proxy war succeeds, the new board members will vote for the target’s purchase.

A Hostile Takeover Comeback?

The 1980s saw a wave of well-publicized aggressive takeovers by “corporate raiders.” Since then, they have mostly happened following market downturns, making companies appealing targets.

After the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance projected more aggressive takeovers in late 2020. The year 2021 saw record mergers and acquisitions. In 2021, PwC reported 62,000 global agreements worth $5.1 trillion, including 130 “megadeals” worth over $5 billion.

Conclusion

  • A tender offer directly solicits shareholders to sell their shares at a premium to the acquirer.
  • A proxy war seeks shareholder support for board member replacements with takeover supporters.
  • Purchasers can also buy shares on the open market.

You May Also Like

File Photo: Hyperautomation

Hyperautomation

11 min read

What is hyperautomation? Hyperautomation: A word becoming more popular in the fast-paced and always-changing world of digital change is “hyper-automation.” Hyperautomation is being used to...  Read more

Notice: The Biznob uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience and analyze our traffic. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Policy.

Ok