Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

DOGE0.070.84%SOL19.370.72%USDC1.000.01%BNB287.900.44%AVAX15.990.06%XLM0.080.37%
USDT1.000%XRP0.392.6%BCH121.000.75%DOT5.710.16%ADA0.320.37%LTC85.290.38%
THE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & LifestyleTHE BIZNOB – Global Business & Financial News – A Business Journal – Focus On Business Leaders, Technology – Enterpeneurship – Finance – Economy – Politics & Lifestyle

Politics

Politics

Constitutional amendment to allow Trump third term introduced in the House

Tennessee Congressman Andy Ogles has introduced a resolution to amend the 22nd Amendment, proposing U.S. presidents serve up to three terms. Backed by Trump supporters and met with fierce opposition, the controversial move has reignited debates about executive power, constitutional safeguards, and the potential longevity of Trump’s historic non-consecutive presidency.

Listen to the article now

In an unexpected move that has reignited heated debate across the political spectrum, Congressman Andy Ogles of Tennessee has introduced a resolution that could fundamentally alter the fabric of American democracy. The Republican lawmaker is proposing to amend the 22nd Amendment, which currently limits U.S. presidents to two terms. If successful, this bold initiative could clear the way for Donald Trump and future leaders to serve three terms or more, a proposition that is both groundbreaking and highly controversial.

Introduced on January 23, 2025—just three days after Trump’s second swearing-in—Ogles’ proposal seeks to update the constitutional language to lift the current two-term restriction to a maximum of three terms. The timing is no coincidence. Ogles, a staunch Trump supporter, argues that extending the possibility of a third term is essential to achieving what he describes as Trump’s “vision of restoring American greatness.” During a press briefing, Ogles declared, “Bold leadership requires bold reforms. The damage caused by previous administrations makes this moment crucial for exceptional, extended leadership.”

Trump himself, settling into a historic second non-consecutive term, has long raised eyebrows with remarks suggesting he could stay in power beyond the traditional limit. Although he has yet to formally endorse Ogles’ resolution, Trump recently hinted at being “open” to the idea, fueling speculation about his ambitions and motivations. His second term has already sparked widespread public discourse about what might unfold after 2029, adding urgency to the proposal’s reception.

Naturally, the proposal has been met with fierce resistance. Congressman Dan Goldman, a Democrat representing New York, has emerged as one of its staunchest opponents. Goldman recently introduced a counter-resolution reinforcing the two-term limit, arguing that it serves as a critical check on executive power. “The framers of the 22nd Amendment understood the risks of consolidating too much power in one individual. This proposal is a direct threat to American democracy,” Goldman stated in a sharp rebuttal. He warned that Ogles’ resolution could set a dangerous precedent, undermining a cornerstone of the nation’s political stability.

The hurdles to rewriting the 22nd Amendment are formidable. Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority approval in both the House and Senate, followed by ratification from three-fourths of the state legislatures. In today’s polarized political climate, bipartisan support for such a radical shift seems almost unattainable. Republicans currently hold only a slim majority in the House, making the odds of achieving this legislative milestone questionable at best. Yet, the mere act of introducing the resolution has stirred fervent debate, energizing Trump supporters while alarming skeptics who view it as an overreach of executive ambition.

Historians and legal experts alike have been quick to weigh in on the potential ramifications. Philip Klinkner, a professor of government at Hamilton College, points to the historical significance of the 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951 in direct response to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s unprecedented four-term presidency. “The 22nd Amendment was designed to prevent one individual from amassing unchecked power over an extended period,” Klinkner explains. He adds that the proposal to allow three terms could fundamentally erode this safeguard.

Interestingly, some experts have speculated about alternative paths Trump allies might explore to keep him in power without formally changing the Constitution. One possibility involves Trump running as a vice presidential candidate in 2028 and reclaiming the presidency if the elected president steps down. Another theory suggests that a close family member, such as Ivanka Trump or Donald Trump Jr., could run for office, allowing Trump to exert influence from behind the scenes.

Public opinion on Ogles’ resolution reflects deep political divisions. Supporters hail the proposal as a necessary step for maintaining dynamic leadership, especially in what they view as a critical era of national restoration under Trump. Opponents, however, caution against dismantling constitutional guardrails that have served the country for decades. They fear that relaxing term limits could open the door to authoritarian tendencies.

Amending the 22nd Amendment would undoubtedly constitute one of the most significant shifts in the U.S. presidency and political norms in living memory. For now, it remains unclear whether Ogles’ proposal will gain the momentum it needs to succeed. What is certain, however, is that the debate it has sparked will keep the nation’s focus squarely on the future and potential longevity of one of the most unconventional presidencies in U.S. history.

As Trump himself quipped at a recent rally, likely adding fuel to the conversation: “If I do another term, do we call it a third term or something different? Maybe 2.5?” Whatever the final outcome, the discussion around the 22nd Amendment will undoubtedly shape the political landscape for years to come.


Comment Template

You May Also Like

Politics

Donald Trump’s plan to revive **impoundment** sparks debate over presidential control of federal spending. Critics argue it **undermines congressional authority** and could trigger legal...

Politics

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s upcoming Washington visit with President Trump aims to solidify Gaza’s fragile ceasefire. With the focus on lasting peace, humanitarian aid,...

Politics

Germany faces intense political turbulence ahead of its snap election, with immigration dominating the debate. Protests erupt against far-right rhetoric while CDU leader Friedrich...

Politics

President Trump reaffirmed his Return-to-Office mandate for federal employees, emphasizing confidence in the government’s deep talent pool despite concerns over resignations or recruitment challenges....

Notice: The Biznob uses cookies to provide necessary website functionality, improve your experience and analyze our traffic. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Policy.

Ok